{"id":112335,"date":"2020-09-02T16:24:43","date_gmt":"2020-09-02T23:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2020\/09\/impact-of-ionizing-radiation-on-superconducting-qubit-coherence"},"modified":"2020-09-02T16:24:43","modified_gmt":"2020-09-02T23:24:43","slug":"impact-of-ionizing-radiation-on-superconducting-qubit-coherence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/2020\/09\/impact-of-ionizing-radiation-on-superconducting-qubit-coherence","title":{"rendered":"Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a class=\"aligncenter blog-photo\" href=\"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog.images\/impact-of-ionizing-radiation-on-superconducting-qubit-coherence.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Technologies that rely on quantum bits (qubits) require long coherence times and high-fidelity operations<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 1\" title=\"DiVincenzo, D. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771&ndash;783 (2000).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR1\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e504\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Superconducting qubits are one of the leading platforms for achieving these objectives<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 2\" title=\"Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505&ndash;510 (2019).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR2\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e508\">2<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 3\" title=\"Kandala, A. et al. Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor. Nature 567, 491&ndash;495 (2019).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR3\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e511\">3<\/a><\/sup>. However, the coherence of superconducting qubits is affected by the breaking of Cooper pairs of electrons<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"Lutchyn, R., Glazman, L. & Larkin, A. Kinetics of the superconducting charge qubit in the presence of a quasiparticle. Phys. Rev. B 74, 064515 (2006).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR4\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e515\">4<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"Martinis, J. M., Ansmann, M. & Aumentado, J. Energy decay in superconducting Josephson-junction qubits from nonequilibrium quasiparticle excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 097002 (2009).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR5\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e515_1\">5<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 6\" title=\"Jin, X. et al. Thermal and residual excited-state population in a 3D transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 240501 (2015).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR6\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e518\">6<\/a><\/sup>. The experimentally observed density of the broken Cooper pairs, referred to as quasiparticles, is orders of magnitude higher than the value predicted at equilibrium by the Bardeen\u2013Cooper\u2013Schrieffer theory of superconductivity<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"Serniak, K. et al. Hot nonequilibrium quasiparticles in transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 157701 (2018).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR7\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e522\">7<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"Aumentado, J., Keller, M. W., Martinis, J. M. & Devoret, M. H. Nonequilibrium quasiparticles and 2e periodicity in single-Cooper-pair transistors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 066802 (2004).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR8\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e522_1\">8<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 9\" title=\"Taupin, M., Khaymovich, I., Meschke, M., Mel\u2019nikov, A. & Pekola, J. Tunable quasiparticle trapping in Meissner and vortex states of mesoscopic superconductors. Nat. Commun. 7, 10977 (2016).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR9\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e525\">9<\/a><\/sup>. Previous work<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"Serniak, K. et al. Direct dispersive monitoring of charge parity in offset-charge-sensitive transmons. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014052 (2019).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR10\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e529\">10<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" title=\"C\u00f3rcoles, A. D. et al. Protecting superconducting qubits from radiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181906 (2011).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR11\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e529_1\">11<\/a>,<a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 12\" title=\"Barends, R. et al. Minimizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113507 (2011).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR12\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e532\">12<\/a><\/sup> has shown that infrared photons considerably increase the quasiparticle density, yet even in the best-isolated systems, it remains much higher<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 10\" title=\"Serniak, K. et al. Direct dispersive monitoring of charge parity in offset-charge-sensitive transmons. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 014052 (2019).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR10\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e537\">10<\/a><\/sup> than expected, suggesting that another generation mechanism exists<sup><a data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"reference anchor\" data-track-label=\"link\" data-test=\"citation-ref\" aria-label=\"Reference 13\" title=\"Bespalov, A., Houzet, M., Meyer, J. S. & Nazarov, Y. V. Theoretical model to explain excess of quasiparticles in superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 117002 (2016).\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2619-8#ref-CR13\" id=\"ref-link-section-d10886e541\">13<\/a><\/sup>. Here we provide evidence that ionizing radiation from environmental radioactive materials and cosmic rays contributes to this observed difference. The effect of ionizing radiation leads to an elevated quasiparticle density, which we predict would ultimately limit the coherence times of superconducting qubits of the type measured here to milliseconds. We further demonstrate that radiation shielding reduces the flux of ionizing radiation and thereby increases the energy-relaxation time. Albeit a small effect for today\u2019s qubits, reducing or mitigating the impact of ionizing radiation will be critical for realizing fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Technologies that rely on quantum bits (qubits) require long coherence times and high-fidelity operations1. Superconducting qubits are one of the leading platforms for achieving these objectives2,3. However, the coherence of superconducting qubits is affected by the breaking of Cooper pairs of electrons4,5,6. The experimentally observed density of the broken Cooper pairs, referred to as quasiparticles, [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":427,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1523,1617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computing","category-quantum-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/427"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112335\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lifeboat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}