Comments on: Dear young Physicists and Architects https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects Safeguarding Humanity Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:01:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-264221 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:01:03 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-264221 Sorry, I meant: https://ottorossler.wordpress.com

]]> By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-264206 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:25:14 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-264206 I forgot to mention my co-authored book “Chaotic Harmony.”

And I would like to mention ottorossler on WordPress.com as an opportunity for further exchanges.

]]> By: Otto E. Rössler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-263852 Wed, 27 May 2015 07:33:22 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-263852 Always good to be skeptical — turning over backwards as Richard Feynman said.
The percentage of fully frontal collisions is, at the low beam intensitis and low calibration present at the moment, negligible compared to the serious runs planned for June.

So there is a genuine chance at the moment that Professor Gianotti responds to the gentle question posed to her — to everyone’s delight.

]]> By: Antonio Vargas https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-263845 Wed, 27 May 2015 05:34:22 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-263845 Otto — Out of curiosity why do you state that these test collisions are not as dangerous? Is it perhaps because it is the proof your argument invalid?

]]> By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-263810 Mon, 25 May 2015 19:10:10 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-263810 The collisions started last Thursday were only non-dangerous “set-up collisions.“
So the captain on the bridge can still decide to give the “Noether Danger” a hearing.

]]> By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-263809 Mon, 25 May 2015 18:58:30 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-263809 P.S.:
There are 4 other new fundamental results implicit in the Noether wheel:

- In-falling particles lose not only their rest mass but also their charge due to the conserved ratio. Hence black holes are uncharged.

- Therefore electrons are not point-shaped or near-point-shaped; for if they were they would be black holes and hence uncharged.

- Therefore micro-black holes are likely to be not maximally small, either. Hence they probably arise at fairly low collision energies.

- Micro black holes are invisible to CERN’s detectors by virtue of their unchargedness.

]]> By: Otto E. Rössler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2015/05/dear-young-physicists-and-architects#comment-263801 Mon, 25 May 2015 14:05:01 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=14377#comment-263801 Thank you.

]]>