Comments on: If c-global can save the World: Why is it being shunned? An Xmas Carol https://lifeboat.com/blog/2014/12/if-c-global-can-save-the-world-why-is-it-being-shunned-an-xmas-carol Safeguarding Humanity Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:51:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 By: Otto E. Rössler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2014/12/if-c-global-can-save-the-world-why-is-it-being-shunned-an-xmas-carol#comment-256620 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:51:50 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=13100#comment-256620 I mentioned already that all planetary media are of the “opinion” that 7 years of new research cannot possibly have changed the safety equation of the “Big-Bang experiment.“
You make it harder for the Lucasian professor if you tell him that this is the point he has to defend. Merry days to all readers!

]]>
By: Tom Kerwick https://lifeboat.com/blog/2014/12/if-c-global-can-save-the-world-why-is-it-being-shunned-an-xmas-carol#comment-256472 Thu, 25 Dec 2014 01:32:05 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=13100#comment-256472 Here we go again. This refers back to your opinion that Einstein’s relativity needs to be ‘re-scaled properly’ in relation to the outside observer perspective of speed of light in a gravitational field. Leading into a curious argument on Hawking Radiation. The CERN safety report however looks at not just Hawking Radiation but other factors such as astronomical observation — which I have debated at length both here and with the LSAG — and accretion estimates of hypothetical stable micro black holes. Perhaps the more pertinent question is whether the safety report is solid enough given that Hawking Radiation as a theory has yet to be experimentally verified, regardless of any postulated disproof (I would suggest it is), and whether this undermines the safety report sufficiently to be of any concern. Happy Christmas, Otto. ;-) Keep your feet on the ground. –Tom.

]]>