Comments on: Play me the Song of Death

By: Otto E. Rossler

Otto E. Rossler — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:11 +0000

Thank you for asking: Do you — or does anyone else — know a lower empirical size limit than 10^(−24) m for either neutrino, electron or quark, found in neutrino measurements? (Note that I do not exclude that neutrinos are point-shaped.)

By: hdc

hdc — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:50:38 +0000

Not surprising that you are not answering.

By: Otto E. Rossler

Otto E. Rossler — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:17:13 +0000

Interesting that suddenly people get excited, isn’t it?

By: PassingByAgain

PassingByAgain — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:53:20 +0000

Rossler wrote: “The idea though: compare with lepton diameter. If the black holes are as small as a lepton (electron, quark) or — as is empirically undistinguishable in the absence of charge — a neutrino, then the capture rate is no larger than that of neutrinos.”

wow, only on this blog can you find so much ignorance and nonsense condensed in just three lines of text… Please, Otto, enlighten us: what would be — in your head — “the diameter of a neutrino”???

By: Otto E. Rossler

Otto E. Rossler — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:51:04 +0000

You are not Keith Curtis, I presume?
Why do you make statements into the blue that are not true?
No scientist ever offered a counter-proof to Telemach. And all counter-arguments to gothic-R made by scientists with a real name to them I countered effectively so the original proponents fell silent.
Thus what you are saying here is plain false. This is why I need to know whether it is my esteemed younger Lampscus colleague Keith Curtis who is writing under this pseudonym.
Take care,
Otto

By: KeithCu

KeithCu — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:24:38 +0000

“You pretend anonymous opinions were sufficient for you to base life-and-death decisions upon them.
Please, show me the single scientist who says he can prove Telemach wrong with a counter-theorem.”

There are many people who have pointed out flaws in your work, only some are anonymous. The important point is your mistakes, not their names. Anyone who systematically reads through the comments to your posts will see you frequently ignore the points the critics make, change the topic, etc.

By: Otto E. Rossler

Otto E. Rossler — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:33:37 +0000

Quote: “ I am sure that regardless of how small an MBH radius you apply the WD will still capture.“
I shall come back to my disproof I gave once you have more time.

The idea though: compare with lepton diameter. If the black holes are as small as a lepton (electron, quark) or — as is empirically undistinguishable in the absence of charge — a neutrino, then the capture rate is no larger than that of neutrinos.
If you can show that even neutrinos generated by the LHC in equal numbers would get stuck inside earth (pardon me: White Dwarfs), then you have won this debate between friends.

I wish you all the luck of the world and of heaven with your personal matters this week. Take care, Otto

By: Tom Kerwick

Tom Kerwick — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:57:23 +0000

Otto — I refer to the WD safety assurance in G&M. While I grant that this derivation is affected by the theorized MBH radius, and I have conceded that a smaller MBH radius would have an impact on this — I am sure that regardless of how small an MBH radius you apply the WD will still capture. I can’t afford the distraction to debate the issue again with you this week as I rather unfortunately have more important personal matters to tend to at the moment. Perhaps you can attempt derive it yourself.

By: Otto E. Rossler

Otto E. Rossler — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:25:40 +0000

Dear Tom:
It is rare in life that another person says “I am your friend.” I accept it and am moved.
Do forgive me that I obviously did not understand where you said you are sure I am wrong.
Please, say it again or copy it. I need your help in this step.
I am most grateful for your 3 lines, dear Tom.
Otto

By: Tom Kerwick

Tom Kerwick — Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:56:50 +0000

Otto — regarding your suggesting “No one says he or she is sure Rössler is wrong.” I have stated this on may occasions and I am hardly a faceless troll. I am your friend that you choose not to understand. However, I cannot derive it to you.