you are right with your comment, and I take back my reproach to Lifeboat. The other canceled posts were promised to be returned with the same disclaimer.

Thank you,
Otto

If you call unsubstantiated dissensus “contradicting a theorem,” you propose to usher-in a new era in physics. Did you take into account that this will not make you many friends amongst serious CERN physicists?

But maybe this was your real intention — to entice one of our honorable CERN colleagues to take heart and propose a first counterargument to Telemach? So this is a very important — either CERN saving or planet-saving — post from your part, I feel. Thank you for it,

Otto

As to the disclaimer, it’s a disclaimer. It is not implying anything at all that you are lying. It simply divorces Lifeboat from your comments. You may not like that, but that is Lifeboat’s call, not yours. That you are going about it so, makes me wonder just how rational you are.

And judging from the RSS feed, they DID put exactly such a disclaimer on it.

I really have no comment about the “violence”. But this is Lifeboat’s site, to run as they see fit, not how one Otto E. Rossler sees fit to run.

You are, however, free to set up your own site and say whatever you wish.

As for “not a single physicist openly contradicts Telemach to the best of my knowledge.” Really? Every scientist at CERN contradicts your Telemach unless you think that they accept its findings and are trying to destroy the world by design. Obviously that isn’t the case and they openly contradicted your claims in court.
Now they may be ignoring you know but they have dealt with you in the past, and have made it clear that they are aware of the concerns but don’t see them as valid.

And please, dear Lifeboat: reactivate my post of today. You can add a derogative statement as you did above, but you promised to no longer use violence. Thank you.