Basically — as nothing can escape from within the event horizon of a non-radiating black hole, anything that gets in the path of such a relativistic MBH is consumed by it (or in your view of the world — approaches it in infinite time?). This would result in the MBH failing to escape the neutron star as I attempted to explain above — it would become embedded.

If you can, please elaborate how the superfluidity characteristic you believe is at play would allow MBH to get through a neutron star without having a force to push anything in infront of its trajectory out of the event horizon’s path and so avoid being consumed…

(Only if historians later get interested in such a situation for some reason does the whole thing become an instance of objective scientific discussion — although the anonmous previous participants are not rehabilitated.)

It is indeed an — and perhaps the central — ingrained mistake of virtually the whole general-relativistic profession, not to know that something like an almost objective universal time existing in the universe — that valid at “space going to infinity”.

This unphysical idealization is quite well appproximated at quite short outer distances from the earth — or outside of a small black hole — for example.

I will have to remind my friend Roger Penrose of not having stressed this point in his beautiful book “Road to Reality” — and for perhaps not knowing humself about this important approximative standard’s physical existence.

For example, he has this wonderful paradigm of many external masses encroaching more and more tightly on an inner region of space with its own nhabitants, mentioned above in the discussion with Tom this afternoon. It is most trivial and interesting to keep in mind that while in their own time, not much will happen to those encroached-upon people, they will all become infinitely slowed in relation to the “outside universe.”

This single ingrained oversight might eventuallly prove to be the deepest reason why the — too consensualistic — relativistic community of very few people across the planet apparently got used to forgetting that nothing can reach a horizon in finite outer time — as Oppenheimer and Snyder still were very much aware of in their seminal 1939 paper.

So again: thank you, dear unknown eq.

But to snap a quark from a nucleus bound by the strongest known force is easily done, Otto?

But in the case of extreme dense stars where the force is even more important suddenly not?