The case is closed, Rössler had his chance, he failed period. There is nothing more to say.

I should mention again that physical theories are about physcial quantities like time, not units of measurement. Something like length of a second is, as was shown countless times before, meaningless esoteric.

So last chance, Rössler. Give the exact derivation and connecntion between the two equations. If you don’t do so, stop bothering any scientist again. They have much beeter things to do with their time then listening to an old cracnk unable to define his own equations.

Is there really no one who can disprove Einstein’s eq.(1) that I quoted (with periods instead of times)? No one would be happier than Einstein that at long last the error in his whole system has been pinpointed. No black holes then any more.

Sorry I insulted you by trying to save your life, my friend.

If you can not answer again no one will care about you anymore. It is proven then that you are not a scientist and definitely not interested in a serious discussion of your stuff and therefore not interested in a serious safety conference. In fact you would have shown then that you yourself are not believing in a real danger and that all your concerns are nothing but a propaganda vehicle for entering the big stage to satisfy your ego and to continue your private crusade against science. If your concerns would be real you would have shown the derivation long before. In contrast you are insulting people and so on.

(Telemach is in fact not a theorem, it is not even a paper. Normally no one would care about it in this non-defined, vague pamphlet filled with buzzwords, non-sequiturs and obvious non-understanding of basic concepts of general relativity theory. And now we have the proof that the author is not even able to derive the simple (and wrong) equations..)

The world is waiting for your derivation of the eq1 as shown in your crap-paper.

Einsteins equation: tdown=tup/(1+z)

And now the world wants to see the exact connection between your eq1 and this equation.

Meaningless blabla like the text above reveals only your inability. In fact it is a capitulation.

Say it and I shall answer. Someone who still believes he can find a counterproof in principle should never be stopped from starting.

And if you have said it before and I did not understand, please, say it anew in a falsifiable manner. Even a “I kannitverstan Theorem” should be put up in a falsifiable manner. Please, try again. And let your peers help you. I do not say it is impossible to falsify Telemach only because my colleagues Nicolai and ‘t Hooft are too weak to do so. Show your strength. The floor is yours.

1998 — the non-defined and therefore absolutely useless diagram will not help you. BTW, there are still pen questions about the axis you strangely have not answered to ever — what a surprise :D

But here and now only your precise mathematical derivation of the telemach eq 1 from Einsteins equation matters. It is strange that instead of showing it straightforward you prefer to chat and insult around…obviosly the danger is not that great.