The answer of a real scientist would look different. But we all know, you are not a real scientist.

Or else at long last a medium of stature like Herald Tribune or Time Magazine or Sciam can muster the courage to interview professor Hermann Nicolai or professor Gerard ‘t Hooft? Or else report on the fact that these eminent colleagues by virtue of their being CERN members are bound by the order to keep their mouths shut regarding indexed scientific literature – like this was today exhibited by the Gran Sasso-CERN cooperation — ?

The most competent man to ask is professor Robert M. Wald. And, in the upper age bracket it is, of course professor Wolfgang Rindler who had responded kindly to Telemachus on his first contact with the lad. I feel the planet has a right to learn what the best scientists of the world have to say, has it not?

By the way, repeating non-defintions instead of giving a clear definition is not a definition.
So again PBAs question:

1) it is precisely clear to you what he means by “temporal wavelength of the light waves”. In this case you should be able to provide a PHYSICAL DEFINITION for it (no “tick tock”, please);

And, again, what is the connection between Einsteins equation tdown=tup/(1+z) and Rösslers? So far he could never give a mathematical and physical clear connection.…

“Engelen said that CERN officials are now instructed, with respect to the L.H.C.’s world-destroying potential, not to say that the probability is very small but that the probability is zero.’”

PBA asked the meaning of “temporal wavelength”. As he surely knows, the wavelength is the period between comparable points in a cycle, e.g., crest to crest, or blip to blip. In a slowdown the frequency of cycles is reduced and the temporal wavelength is increased, e.g. the period between blips becomes relatively longer — even if seemingly normal to the “locals”.

From your hopelessly vague words above: “Temporal means related to time, and wavelength means distance between tick and tock of a cesium clock”, you seem to think that this “temporal wavelength of the light waves” is the period (= the time between “tick” and “tock”) of the clock. Rossler would agree with you from time to time (except when he claims that T is a frequency or some sciencey-sounding baloney such as “temporal wavelength”).

However, how do you measure this “tick tock” of yours? If you measure it in local proper time, then the “tick tock” downstairs (in units of proper time downstairs) is just as long as the “tick tock” upstairs (in units of proper time upstairs), because that is the definition of equal clocks. If you measure it in different units, please state which ones.

Anyway, this is just one more rehash of the “longer seconds” nonsense that we’ve been having on this blog for months, and I have by now lost interest in arguing about it with Rossler (I presume that the same happened to TRMG). I have more of an anthropological interest — if you want — in understanding what drives Rossler’s toadies. For example, when you state so assuredly that Rossler “has clarified precisely the term T”, I see two options:

1) it is precisely clear to you what he means by “temporal wavelength of the light waves”. In this case you should be able to provide a physical definition for it (no “tick tock”, please);

2) you have no idea what it means, but you are impressed by it because it sounds difficult and sciencey, then it must be right. In this case… well, you see where I am going ;-)

P.S. I hope you were being ironic about Houston’s “novel algebra” of pints and quarts (but nothing is granted at this stage… ;-)

But Houston has explained this very well, PBA, according to his novel mathematical algebra drawn from the very first pages of a textbook, and endorsed by the Professor. Temporal means related to time, and wavelength means distance between tick and tock of a cesium clock, so what we have here is a tick tock downstairs which is longer than the tick tock upstairs in the rocket, so that the clock downstairs take longer to tick tock than the clock upstairs, so it registers a shorter time downstairs in that tick tock than the one upstairs.

I am amazed that you haven’t cottoned on to this PassingBy. TRMG apparently has, since he has registered no objection despite the fact that earlier he was aiming to bat every ball bowled by Rossler over the boundary for a six (my metaphor is drawn from cricket) but complaining that they were all googlies which travel in a corkscrew path like a knuckleball and are very hard to hit,

If you have an objection to this, PBA, please register it in chapter and verse, unless you are waiting for TRMG to return from whatever has pulled him away.

That’s a mighty big ‘if’ Otto ;-)

And no, alleging ‘an attempt at everyone’s life’ is not the same thing as alleging anti-semistism. The latter is alleging racial prejudice.