Comments on: With no other Jewish person speaking up, I am authorized to say in the name of Jacob: “The ‘Lord’ Orders CERN to Stop until Proven Innocuous” https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d Safeguarding Humanity Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:08:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-87085 Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:08:47 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-87085 Sorry, it took a while to understand, but you did not do anything wrong. A new experiment might be cynicism while only some academic algebra people got upset, but their normal- and metaphysics are based on bone-hard calculations, suggesting: 1 dangerous particle experiment = security against risk. 2 dangerous particle experiments = 2 times security against risk. Their normally undisproved calculations require: run a dangerous experiment with algebra to show that an already 3 years old report from Nobel- and further –priced scientists will never ever become a risk. Further hard math in psychology does not work anymore, as the findings of Doctors and your hardest critics who still comment to the ongoing distribution of articles about particle physics, suggest. Normal scientists with emotional sickness and their defunct ability of having and showing real fears in hindsight to a dangerous particle experiment know best that math in psychology is less hard but their algebra, because they are intelligent to cope with the above mentioned calculation, or: 1 dangerous experiment + 1 = dangerous experiment equals less than 1 dangerous experiment. With these findings we do not need to provide hard math formulas in psychology to them, but we must trust their algebraic generosity, sometimes abusive-in-language –and algebra too- telling us that 10000 scientists are never wrong, because of normal- and metaphysics.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85864 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:09:12 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85864 It is cute to see how the mere suggestion to look twice is perceived as an assault on her majesty‘s dignity. Like forbidding to say “please.” I am ready to apologize if someone can tell me what I did wrong.

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85832 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:04:50 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85832 Hopefully, the spreading of indignities will not be continued by a medium like Herald Tribune. In the past, one problem was not only the negative comments on this blog challenging your religion. Just before, various news publishers were also tied to a negative opinion about the advocates of higher safety for experimentation. Here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1053091/Meet-Evans-Atom-end-world-Wednesday.html we are put into the category of doom-mongers. And here http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1838947,00.html we are put into the category of doomsayers with old-fashioned the-end-is-nigh hysteria. This overly negative opinion about safety only puts us more into danger.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85791 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:25:39 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85791 I would like to follow your suggestion but do not know how.

Also I think the way we are discussing this is already optimal. The word will spread that a first responsible medium like Herald Tribune cannot stay silent any longer in view of Hawking having not answered. Maybe he is unable to and hence is excused. We all like him. Even the pope does.

All we need is love. I mean, a wife of Pilatus, but one who makes sure her husband listens to her. A single Jewish mother on the planet.

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85771 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:37:51 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85771 Have you already emailed a request to [email protected] to kindly ask the Scientific Advisory Board for updating the ParticleAcceleratorShield by adding the most valuable of your own suggestions from your blog articles to its content? After they have accomplished this, just email them again to make a proposition for moving the ParticleAcceleratorShield to Current Programs. Regarding a conference and related requests, I have only confirmed your educated suggestions with my own words. Certainly, I would not know better than you.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85765 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:10:37 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85765 You know better than me: How can I add to Sir Martin Rees and Nick Bostrom’s assessements another one to say there what you suggest?

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85762 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:58:57 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85762 ParticleAcceleratorShield is an ongoing program. So it would be good to both feature the old view and an update, incl. your name and outlook about the conference, below Sir Martin Rees’ and Nick Bostrom’s assessments. A conference has to happen ASAP, so the ParticleAcceleratorShield can make a difference when available among Current Programs.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rössler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85757 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:29:26 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85757 Is this not a balanced attitude from the part of lifeboat to do both?: To both feature the old CERN view and to allow for a call to re-evaluate the risk in light of later findings that imply that every person on the planet is threatened unless the disproof publicly requested for three years is at last allowed to be tried in a scientific safety conference before it is definitively too late?

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85739 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:19:32 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85739 Thank you very much for your highly important work. It seems as if the ParticleAcceleratorShield http://lifeboat.com/ex/particle.accelerator.shield requires new suggestions that could eventually be sent from you to [email protected]. Are you in favor to suggest moving the ParticleAcceleratorShield from the http://lifeboat.com/ex/programs section Future Programs to Current Programs? Please try.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rössler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/06/with-no-other-jewish-person-speaking-up-i-am-authorized-to-say-in-the-name-of-jacob-%e2%80%9cthe-%e2%80%98lord%e2%80%99-orders-cern-to-stop-until-proven-innocuous%e2%80%9d#comment-85737 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:16:50 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1852#comment-85737 Thank you for your sharing with me the view that an undisproved proven risk deserves a scientific safety conference before the experiment in question is allowed to go on raising the cumulative risk day by day.

This protection every human being has the right to expect from the United Nations.

]]>