Comments on: Dark Non-Sci-Fi https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi Safeguarding Humanity Thu, 26 May 2011 11:03:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84652 Thu, 26 May 2011 11:03:10 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84652 Thank you for waiting to see with me what Congress will do to protect the citizens.

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84649 Thu, 26 May 2011 08:43:55 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84649 There should be no need to apologize. Better not exposing too much losses of dignity from being held up by those repetitions. Please only tolerate something if Hawking personally told them or from those who are in the position of falsifying his results on their own. It makes me happy to find your points and the previously discussed epilog are very important for being presented before a higher political institution.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84623 Wed, 25 May 2011 21:12:14 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84623 Dear Mr. Card:

Thank you for maximally concisely repeating the status of knowledge before my papers disproving each of the points you mentioned had either appeared in print (in July 2008) or appeared on the Internet, staying undisproved to the best of my knowledge up tothis day.

I apologize for my undignified insisting that CRN stop its politics of pretending not to know these results and acting accordingly. Why ignore the request for a scientific safety conference, made last January by a court?

I will cherish your advice.

]]>
By: Geoffrey Card https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84453 Tue, 24 May 2011 23:31:12 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84453 To my understanding, even if the LHC produces (a) black hole(s), they will not be of sufficient size or energy to threaten the Earth and will likely dissipate into Hawking radiation and/or pass through the Earth.
In addition, if such were likely, it should have already happened in our atmosphere where cosmic rays collide with particles at energies much higher than that of the LHC.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84369 Mon, 23 May 2011 12:19:10 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84369 Thank you for your advice.

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84362 Mon, 23 May 2011 08:41:31 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84362 Sorry, who is receiving your apology? Just do not bother if I was or was not interested in any kind of appraisal for communications the President could be expecting. It is not my concern to question his responsibility, but an authority of global leadership has to be elected by voters in any capable country. Saying that one politician is especially charismatic and one with the largest competent constituency does not mean he got elected by voters or their representative officials in any capable country. One who rules the US is not the leader of many other countries on this planet as far as they are capable of timely action in terms of the important human right for global security. Please establish a contact with a higher institution who got elected by voters or their representative officials in any capable country. There has to be a higher institution for worldwide security in all the countries, authorities, international societies, and organizations on Earth. If you cannot find this one, we are a highly endangered species.

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84343 Sun, 22 May 2011 21:18:41 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84343 You are right. Many elected persons are equally called upon by definition, one for each country. But you see, there is one country with an especially charismatic president, and it happens to be the one with the largest competent constituency at the time being. Even foreigners try to use its language and be understood by its caring citizens.

Most of my scientific friends live in the US where my son was born. So I apologize meekly for having turned to your president as the most promising candidate to speak up in defense of the life of every earthling.

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84341 Sun, 22 May 2011 20:21:37 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84341 So far your appeal to the President has occurred and the recent response to Prof. Tottoliā€™s comment http://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dear-mr-president#comments by Ed Sweet on May 21, 2011, may not be insuring enough to abandon further measures. Nevertheless, the President has responsibility for counteraction in terms of danger an institute with the rank of a military organization in the US could be causing. So he has not been elected to prevent a global disaster from something that might be caused outside the US. So he was not even elected by the majority of voters among the human race or their representative officials. Who got elected by them for taking over the required responsibility?

]]>
By: Otto E. Rossler https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84335 Sun, 22 May 2011 15:07:50 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84335 Can this really be? Is there no way to alert the elected officials to do their duty?

]]>
By: robomoon https://lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/dark-non-sci-fi#comment-84328 Sun, 22 May 2011 10:51:04 +0000 http://lifeboat.com/blog/?p=1836#comment-84328 Somewhere there is also a great silence with a heightened probability that reviewers of the Telemach black-hole theorem get silently away and never raise their voice again after showing fairly questionable conclusions in terms of philosophy while not really having done the necessary calculations to prove the thesis wrong. The probability gets also heightened in terms of scientists who are silently doing some experiments in research institutes the public has not been sufficiently informed about the increasing danger and they might be rather busy in calculating investment frequencies for new lab equipment. What is 10 percent of a chance that the Earth will be annihilated compared to 90 percent of a chance of having some fun, enough money, and prestige from one and another useless research project?

]]>