https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Shang 2026-04-22T12:46:10Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.11 https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/index.php?title=User:Shang&diff=363 2013-03-09T01:45:47Z

<p>Shang: </p> <hr /> <div>The facts of this case:<br /> <br /> The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster.<br /> 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed<br /> 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .<br /> <br /> My conclusions :They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.<br /> <br /> Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.<br /> <br /> Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .</div>

Shang https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/index.php?title=User:Shang&diff=362 2013-03-09T01:44:32Z

<p>Shang: </p> <hr /> <div>The facts of this case:<br /> The facts of this failure are that : 1.the faulty design of solid rockets booster.<br /> 2.insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed<br /> 3.lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .<br /> My conclusions :They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.<br /> Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.<br /> Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .</div>

Shang https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/index.php?title=User:Shang&diff=361 2013-03-09T01:43:56Z

<p>Shang: </p> <hr /> <div>The facts of this case:<br /> The facts of this failure are that : the faulty design of solid rockets booster.<br /> insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed<br /> lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .<br /> My conclusions :They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.<br /> Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.<br /> Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .</div>

Shang https://lifeboat.com/InfoPreserver/index.php?title=User:Shang&diff=360 2013-03-09T01:41:45Z

<p>Shang: Created page with &quot;The facts of this case: The facts of this failure are that : 1, the faulty design of solid rockets booster. 2, insufficient low-temperature t...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>The facts of this case:<br /> The facts of this failure are that : 1, the faulty design of solid rockets booster.<br /> 2, insufficient low-temperature testing of the O-ring material and of the joints that the O-ring sealed<br /> 3, lack of proper communication between different levels of NASA .<br /> My conclusions :They should have a lot more communications to find out this incorrect design. Then this tragedy might be avoided.<br /> Future environment: In the future, when technique gets much more advanced,and more communication are undergone , this tragedy will probably not gonna happen.<br /> Future scenario:If this case happened again in the future , those managers people will get fired and might get sued .</div>

Shang