Global warming is bad. But just how bad could it be, worst case? Could it make the Earth hotter than a self-cleaning oven, like it did Venus? Venus is even hotter than Mercury even though Mercury is closer to the sun, because of Venus’s greenhouse effect. But there seems little reason to fear such a runaway greenhouse effect on Earth. Aside from the fact that it has never happened here before, the Earth may simply not have enough solar energy and greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide and methane) to start the runaway positive feedback process that happened on Venus. Some day that may change, however — the sun is getting hotter as it grows older, and greenhouse gases, perhaps exotic and powerful ones, could potentially be manufactured and released by hostile invading extraterrestrials, robots, or apocalypse-minded humans. But let’s ignore this scenario as unlikely for now (so that we could claim to be optimists, if not for the following paragraphs). Is there any other apocalyptic global warming scenario still to worry about? Something that is not only known to be theoretically possible, but has actually happened? Say, a stinking poison that contaminates the atmosphere and waters of the entire Earth, not only wrinkling noses worldwide but killing off almost all living things? Welcome to the gray, dead plains (often warm and balmy), oxygen-starved waters, green skies and repellent smell of hydrogen sulfide poisoned Earth.
Hydrogen sulfide, H2S, is a gas. Chemically similar to H2O (water) but with a sulfur atom in place of water’s oxygen, it is not a necessity of life like water, but very poisonous. Much less than 1 part per million (ppm) in the air is detectable as an odor like rotten eggs. 10 ppm is a typical occupational exposure limit. 1 part in 1000 in air can cause rapid death. As a young man I kept several 1-gallon milk jugs of green algae-containing water, which I fertilized with vegetable peels and such. It worked great, but there was one slight problem: some vegetables contain substantial amounts of sulfur, which can lead to H2S dissolved in the water especially in the muck at the bottom. I finally dumped all the algae water down the toilet rather than move it to another apartment (a decision with which you are welcome to disagree). Some were smellier than others, and I ended up with a modest case of hydrogen sulfide poisoning. Main symptom: a mental “slide show” of colorful crystalline images, presumably the result of H2S-caused inhibition of cellular respiration in the brain. Like humans, most animals and plants are poisoned by H2S.
How might H2S come to poison the Earth? Like it did in the past. The dinosaurs are thought to have perished in a mass extinction event triggered by an small asteroid, several miles in diameter, crashing into the ground near the town of Chicxulub on the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico, 65 million years ago (mya). But the worst extinction event of all time is believed by many to have been caused by H2S. This was the much earlier Permian-Triassic (or P-Tr) extinction event of 251.4 mya — about 20 million years before any dinosaur was even a gleam in its mother’s eye. The vast majority of plant and animal species then in existence went extinct, both in the sea and on land. The P-Tr event is often called the “Great Dying.” A similar process could play out in humanity’s future, potentially ending it. Here is how.
The causal process begins with global warming. While massive volcanism in Siberia is thought to have triggered global warming by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere back then, human burning of fossil fuel is doing it now. This warming is melting sea ice which darkens the ocean surface, causing more sunlight to be absorbed and worsening the warming trend. As the oceans warm, methane hydrate crystals deep underwater will warm too, which may cause methane to be released into the atmosphere. Methane is a greenhouse gas like carbon dioxide, except many times more powerful. Such a release of methane from the ocean floor is a likely though still controversial cause of the global temperature spike called the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum of 55.8 mya, during which average global temperatures soared over 10°F.
Heating of the Earth’s surface causes the top layer of the polar oceans to warm disproportionately. Normally, cold air in the polar regions chills and oxygenates the surface waters, and salinates them by evaporating some water and leaving the salt, which makes the remaining water saltier. The cold and extra salt makes these waters denser, so that they sink and flow along the bottom, causing a planet-wide current of oxygen-rich water called the thermohaline circulation that connects the bottoms of the oceans. Global warming affects the polar regions the most, and warmer temperatures there can slow and potentially even halt the thermohaline circulation, thereby slowing or stopping oxygen from getting to the ocean depths.
Back in the Great Dying, it is hypothesized that after the thermohaline circulation stopped, the oxygen in the deep ocean waters was used up by the organisms that live down there. But some microbes don’t need oxygen gas dissolved in the water. Bad news — they get their oxygen instead from oxygen-containing sulfur compounds, and release the villain…hydrogen sulfide (just as they did at the bottoms of those algae water-containing plastic milk jugs). But it gets worse. The hydrogen sulfide slowly accumulated in the ocean waters, poisoning many of the remaining oxygen-breathing organisms. That explains why the extinction event was so devastating to marine life. Things went from awful to even worse. So much hydrogen sulfide accumulated that it started leaking from the water into the atmosphere. Because such a low concentration of hydrogen sulfide is needed to create a bad stink, if this happens during the human era the first blatantly obvious sign will be the smell of rotten eggs. It will be everywhere. Though unpleasant, it is not harmful until the concentration grows. As it accumulates in the atmosphere though, the smell will go from bad to worse, and eventually the increasing amount of H2S will start poisoning land life. And the sky will turn green. That can explain the devastation to land life during the Great Dying. And maybe it could happen again.
Recommendations
No need to buy a gas mask just yet. Thing won’t start getting really bad during our lifetimes. But this could be an existential risk to our species. Thus, scientific study is important. A serious risk is that things we do in our lifetimes may be the trigger for an extinction event later. It should be obvious that it would be the height of irresponsibility to let that happen. Yet there will always be forces of irresponsibility. One may hope that those forces fail to win or their victory may be a Pyrrhic one indeed.
Reference
There is a lot of both popular and scientific literature on this topic. A well-known full length work that bridges the gap between those literatures is P. D. Ward, Under a Green Sky, HarperCollins, 2007.
<>CoMmEnT FrIeNdLy BlOg<>
This is a comment-friendly blog article! This notice certifies that the blogger pledges to respond to all posted comments.




Space colonies are essential in mitigating existential risks such as you mention here!
Thanks for the comment. Although I agree with your logic as far as it goes, here is something else to keep in mind. Any extraterrestrial colony will most likely not contain either you or anyone close to you. So in that sense it doesn’t help. Yes, it is good for the human species, but not for anyone you care about.
We Will Save the Human Species by Space Colonization for Global Security (in our flight business).
Save our species, perhaps. But space colonization does not address saving the glob.
“Thing won’t start getting really bad during our lifetimes. ” Things most certainly are pretty bad in our lifetimes for the many island nations whose entire country needs to be evacuated…in our lifetimes, the end of summer arctic ice…and you did not mention ocean acidification…not just a “theory” but a fact that it’s already about 30% higher in acid concentration today, than before the industrial revolution…google “ocean acidification” (that’s the term for it, not “dis-alkalinization”) That 30% huge increase looks small on the logarithmic scale as “only” 0.11 lower in pH, that means 30% higher hydrogen ion (acidity) concentration..and that’s today…by 2050 it is projected to be much, much higher acidity concentration from the CO2 we;re massively dumping into the atmosphere that forms carbonic acid..have a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification#Acidification
and follow the links from there to the scientific research cited
Yes, you are absolutely right! (I was referring specifically to the H2S issue, but obviously there are others as well.)
Global Warming has to be your #1 concern here is why:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/08/monckt.…./#comments
comment # 253
Barton Paul Levenson says:
11 August 2010 at 6:05 AM
Speaking of catastrophic…
Dr. Aiguo Dai was kind enough to point me to his team’s collected drought database on line and explain to me how to use it. I have put together annual time series for what I’m calling F, the fraction of Earth’s land surface in “severe drought” by the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI <= 3), and P, the mean global PDSI.
I’ve tentatively fit the first with a cubic [!] equation. Still have to correct for autocorrelation and so on, but given that human agriculture collapses when F hits 70%, my very preliminary estimate is that this happens in 2037 AD, give or take five years. The 70% number is of course debatable, as is my curve-fit (N = 136, R^2 = 0.55). I’m working on refining my statistical analysis in hopes of publishing a paper about this.
For those who care, F was 5% in 1870, 12% in 1970, hit a temporary peak of 31% in 2003, and is currently at 21%. It’s a very variable series, which is NOT good news. The reason why is left as an exercise for the student.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/08/doing-.…./#comments
Comment 74
. Second estimate: 2051 is the year the fraction of Earth’s land surface in severe drought hits 70%, and global human agriculture collapses. My previous estimate was 2037, so we’re a little better off. I’ve written up the statistical analysis as an article. I’ve asked Tamino to check the statistical work; waiting for his reply. Would any pro climatologists be willing to look at the article before I submit it? I desperately want this to pass peer review. And if I’m right, the word has to get out. Soon. Please help.
Reference: “The Long Summer” by Brian Fagan and “Collapse” by Jared Diamond. When agriculture collapses, civilization collapses. Fagan and Diamond told the stories of something like 2 dozen previous very small civilizations. Most of the collapses were caused by fraction of a degree climate changes. In some cases, all of that group died. On the average, 1 out of 10,000 survived. We humans could go EXTINCT in 2051.
There is NO ETHICAL DILEMMA. What we MUST do is obvious. We MUST cut our CO2 output immediately and as much and as fast as possible, regardless of who goes broke. Blood is on your hands if you don’t take extreme action now. Cut CO2 production 40% by the end of 2015. [How to do this: Replace all coal fired power plants with nuclear.] Continuing to make CO2 is the greatest imaginable GENOCIDE.
Here is a question for you modelers: what if oil production has peaked or will peak very soon? Will that solve our problems or won’t it?
Regarding going nuclear to avoid CO2, it’s too polluting of radioactive waste of multi-thousand-year radioactive wastes and radioactive decommissioned nuclear reactors. We have to learn to live on our ration of solar and wind energy, which probably requires drastic population reduction, by humane means, of course, probably large-scale voluntary contraception, which requires in turn large-scale education programs. Difficult but the necessary alternative to dangers of both the nuclear and the fossil-fuel alternatives.
There is a lot of wind energy out there that is not used, but even more, there is many times more solar energy hitting the Earth than the amount of energy of all kinds that we consume. So solar energy really could solve all our energy needs.
problem with voluntary contraception. Only those smart enough to realize the necessity will do it. Those too stupid, ignorant, or perhaps just arrogant won’t. Thus you’re selecting for more stupid, ignorant, arrogant people when you attempt something like this.